Editor:
I am writing regarding the issue of the waiver at the recreation complex.
The waiver was not, “ ...to inform patrons of the fact that there are inherent risks in using the recreation facility,” as quoted the Tribune. The waiver was to prevent insurance companies from having to pay settlements. By signing the waiver you were waiving your right to sue under Canadian law, even if the facility were grossly negligent.
I am very concerned when a business can operate in Canada and openly encourage Canadian citizens to waive their rights under Canadian law.
It is further distressing that they expect an elected body to agree to this. Our city councillors and CRD members take an oath to uphold Canadian laws and protect the rights of its citizens. How alarming that they be asked to participate in voiding those laws.
I question that this coercive practice of using waivers should be legal in Canada. I don’t know if this is a judicial or a legislative issue, but there needs to be change. Insurance companies don’t make the laws. And they don’t get to outlaw them either.
It does concern me that some people did sign the waiver. Ironic that while we are celebrating the bravery of our soldiers in Afghanistan who are sacrificing their lives for some rights, that we back home here won’t sacrifice a swim pass to protect the rights we have.
I am thankful and proud, however, that so many people did refuse to sign the waiver. City Hall should honour them in some way for exemplary citizenship.
Stuart Westie
Williams Lake