Editor:
Open letter to MLA Lorne Doerkson
In response to your recent commentary on the amendments to the Land Act, I feel compelled to share a perspective that champions the need for a more inclusive approach to the stewardship of British Columbia’s public lands.
Recent discussions on the Land Act’s amendments have sparked a contentious debate, framed by some as a democratic backslide. However, this narrative misses a crucial point: the amendments represent a stride toward a more inclusive approach to managing B.C.’s valued public lands. As someone deeply entrenched in trail development and an advocate for reconciliation, I see this moment not as a loss but as a significant opportunity for progress. The essence of public lands being the province of all British Columbians is undeniable. Yet, acknowledging this truth requires us to confront a historical oversight—the consistent exclusion of Indigenous voices from the conversation about land that they have been connected to for millennia. The adjustments to the Land Act, particularly aimed at supporting Indigenous involvement, are not diminishing democracy but broadening its embrace, in line with DRIPA’s (Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act) spirit.
Critics argue these changes would give “veto power to just five percent of the population over 95 percent of the land in B.C.” This perspective fails to acknowledge the intricate relationship between Indigenous peoples and the land, and the historical injustices these amendments seek to address. It is not about granting exclusive power but about rectifying the imbalance in a system that has long marginalized Indigenous voices.
In my professional journey, the blending of diverse perspectives has always led to more vibrant and sustainable outdoor spaces. Success is achieved when planning reflects the collective wisdom of Indigenous communities, recreational enthusiasts, and conservation experts. This approach not only enriches our natural heritage but guarantees its preservation for future generations. Moving forward requires us to view these legislative changes not as a threat but as a chance to deepen our democratic values through inclusivity. Elevating Indigenous rights and participation shouldn’t be seen as a concession but as a crucial step toward genuine reconciliation and a fairer society. I encourage my fellow British Columbians to consider the long-lasting benefits of adopting a more inclusive stance on land management.
Tom Schoen
Williams Lake